Is LiteSpeed better than Apache and Nginx?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Is LiteSpeed better than Apache and Nginx?

    May I know which one is better?

    #2
    LiteSpeed is best.It is based on an event-driven architecture, which allows it to serve static material significantly more quickly than Apache.

    Comment


      #3
      LiteSpeed is best.It is based on an event-driven architecture, which allows it to serve static material significantly more quickly than Apache.

      Comment


        #4
        LiteSpeed also offers advanced DDoS protection, lowering download during high traffic.When compared to Nginx, OpenLiteSpeed has a higher TTFB and can manage a large number of concurrent users. When compared to the Nginx stack, OpenLiteSpeed requires fewer server resources, resulting in lower server expenses.

        Comment


          #5

          Nginx is the king of static content serving!​

          Comment


            #6
            In a series of benchmarking tests, LiteSpeed's HTTP/3 implementation demonstrated higher performance than that of the hybrid NGINX/Quiche.

            Comment


              #7
              Is LiteSpeed free of cost?

              Comment


                #8
                No it is not. OpenLitespeed is free. With fewer features.

                Comment


                  #9
                  The Apache code is not used in the LiteSpeed Web Server. When you look behind the hood, it has more in common with Nginx.​

                  Comment


                    #10
                    LiteSpeed serves static content faster than any other web server. It increases PHP performance due to its custom PHP LSAPI.​

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Ok. That means LiteSpeed is best.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X