Is LiteSpeed better than Apache and Nginx?

[Milo Adey]

May I know which one is better?

[Emma Peterson]

LiteSpeed is best.It is based on an event-driven architecture, which allows it to serve static material significantly more quickly than Apache.

[River Brown]

LiteSpeed is best.It is based on an event-driven architecture, which allows it to serve static material significantly more quickly than Apache.

[Jamie Lee]

LiteSpeed also offers advanced DDoS protection, lowering download during high traffic.When compared to Nginx, OpenLiteSpeed has a higher TTFB and can manage a large number of concurrent users. When compared to the Nginx stack, OpenLiteSpeed requires fewer server resources, resulting in lower server expenses.

[Clara Smith]

Nginx is the king of static content serving!

[Hazel Williams]

In a series of benchmarking tests, LiteSpeed's HTTP/3 implementation demonstrated higher performance than that of the hybrid NGINX/Quiche.

[cooper smith]

Is LiteSpeed free of cost?

[River Brown]

No it is not. OpenLitespeed is free. With fewer features.

[Hazel Williams]

The Apache code is not used in the LiteSpeed Web Server. When you look behind the hood, it has more in common with Nginx.

[Emerson Abby]

LiteSpeed serves static content faster than any other web server. It increases PHP performance due to its custom PHP LSAPI.

[Milo Adey]

Ok. That means LiteSpeed is best.